BurlingtonBiker

The bollards at the entrance of Bicentennial Park (next to the bathrooms) do not have any sort of pavement markings to make them more visible to bicyclists. In light of the recent bollard-related lawsuit against King County by a bicyclist, it might be a good idea to look into pavement markings at this location.

The bollards at the Green River Trail underpass (under S 200th St) do not have any sort of pavement markings to make them more visible to bicyclists. In light of the recent bollard-related lawsuit against King County by a bicyclist, it might be a good idea to look into pavement markings at this location.

IN ADDITION, the bollards between the Green River Trail and the parking lot for the Three Friends Fishing Hole picnic shelter do not have any pavement markings, but I don't know whether or not they would be required here.

The bollards at both the very north end of the park and the very south end of the park, along the Green River Trail, do not have any sort of pavement markings to make them more visible to bicyclists. In light of the recent bollard-related lawsuit against King County by a bicyclist, it might be a good idea to look into pavement markings at these locations.

The yellow bollard at the intersection of Christensen Rd and the Green River Trail does not have any sort of pavement markings to make it more visible to bicyclists. In light of the recent bollard-related lawsuit against King County by a bicyclist, it might be a good idea to look into pavement markings at this location.

The new silver bollards near the brand-new pedestrian bridge on the Green River Trail do not have any sort of pavement markings to make them more visible to bicyclists. In light of the recent bollard-related lawsuit against King County by a bicyclist, it might be a good idea to look into pavement markings at this location.

1-800-GOT-JUNK has placed a large plastic advertising sign right next to the road at the park entrance (the Salmon Hole parking lot). They seem to believe Burlington's parks and roadsides are for their advertising use, not realizing (or caring) that most of us consider their signs to be roadside trash and an eyesore. I also removed several of their signs yesterday on Rt 127 in Burlington, but they keep popping up faster than I can remove them.

Could Code Enforcement and/or the Police Department give 1-800-GOT-JUNK's owner a call and let them know that placing their advertising signs on our roadways is illegal and unacceptable behavior in our community? They might need firmer reinforcement than some other code offenders, since they leave this litter all over the county after being told REPEATEDLY by multiple town officials that it's not OK.

Thank you.

Old 3-tier metal filing cabinet has been sitting on the greenbelt for many days, in front of 244 Church St.

The top bolt securing the yellow diamond "walker dude" pedestrian sign to its pole has come undone. The sign is flopped over at an angle. This is the south-facing pedestrian sign on Spear just south of the Swift/Spear intersection.

The west-facing "red hand" "do not walk" pedestrian signal on the east side of Dorset St at this intersection is burnt out/inoperational as of yesterday afternoon. It appears to be the older style with a bulb, not LEDs.