Descrizione
Sec. 82-2. Definitions.
Abandoned Sign – A sign that identifies a business, person, or activity that has ceased to operate on the premises on which the sign is located.
Sec. 82-3. GENERAL.
f. All signs, including supports, braces and anchors, shall be kept in
good repair and neat appearance. The face or display surface of
all signs shall be kept neatly posted or painted at all times.
Removable panels shall be free of cracks, breaks, holes, fading or
any other damage. Missing sign panels shall be replaced within 30
days or evidence of sign repair in progress, evidence of which must
be provided to and approved by the City Building Inspection
Department. All electrical and/or electronic components be
maintained in good working conditions.
g. All signs shall be subject to inspection by the City’s Code
Enforcement and Building Inspections. Any sign which, because of
damage or disrepair, becomes a hazard to public health or safety or
is not being maintained as provided herein, shall be immediately
removed upon receipt of notice from the City. An abandoned sign
shall be removed on the first anniversary of its abandonment, or on
the second anniversary if the property is leased. In addition to any
other remedies available to the City, any sign remaining in violation
of this provision may be removed by the City and the sign may be
sold at private or public sale. The owner of the sign shall be
responsible for all costs of removal, storage and sale. The
proceeds from the sale of such sign shall offset the City’s costs in
removing, storing and selling such sign and the balance remaining,
if any, shall be refunded to the owner
9 Commentos
Riconosciuto City of Haltom City (Utente registrato)
Chiusa City of Haltom City (Utente registrato)
DLynn (Ospite)
Reopened Barking DOG (Ospite)
heresyoursign (Ospite)
Congratulations on Closing the Car Wash sign issue
Maybe just maybe this sign will be fixed or replaced. City staff failed to tell us exactly when the application started or when it will be finished. The car wash has been gone a long time. I thought abandoned signs were to be addressed in one year.
“An abandoned sign
shall be removed on the first anniversary of its abandonment, or on
the second anniversary if the property is leased.” City law
Heresyoursign
DLynn (Ospite)
Innocent Bystander (Utente registrato)
Wonderwoman (Ospite)
I was wondering.............................
.When the city says;
"The renovation of this sign is part of a remodel plan that has been submitted and the city is reviewing. If the owner/investor does not pursue the remodel, then the sign will be addressed separate"
How long will they take to "review" a remodel plan?
Wonderwoman
The Numbers Man (Ospite)
Wonderwoman,
The answer is the city has been reviewing and taking no action for 459 days... and counting.
Here are the minutes from the meeting where “the Car wash “ improvements were discussed.
Please note the date
April of 2010
ACTUAL APPROVED MINUTES !!
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
4/13/10 Page 2
PUBLIC HEARING
PZ-001-10 Conduct a public hearing and consideration and/or action on the application of Ernie Hedgcoth, for a variance request to the Haltom City Planning and Zoning Commission serving as the “Appeal Board”, City of Haltom City Code of Ordinances, Chapter 38 “Flood Protection and Prevention”, Article II, “Administration”, Section 38-24, Variance Procedures”, for substantial non-residential reconstruction within a floodway,
for the existing car wash located on Lot 1, Blk. 1, MMR Add’n., located in the “C-3” Commercial District, containing approximately 0.4990 acres, locally known as 5403 E. Belknap St.
Mr. Pliska reviewed the case.
Mr. Pliska said that the legal notice was published in the April 2, 2010 Fort Worth Star Telegram, and ten (10) property owners had been notified. Staff has received three (3) written responses in favor of the request, zero (0) opposed and zero (0) returned.
Commission member Jones asked if FEMA monitors these variances and if there are few that get approved.
Mr. Ice said yes FEMA monitors these closely.
Commission member Pinkerton asked if this stays with the property if sold.
Mr. Ice said this is approved for these improvements only. Any other work would need to come before the Commission again.
Mr. Hedgcoth, Engineer, said there hasn’t been a flood in this particular area since ’89. In the late 70’s Mr. Markum owned this property prior. This will help beautify the Belknap corridor