Sharraxaadda
This seems to be an unregistered rental property. (since last September) It's supposed to be owner occupied based on the owner occupied covenant when it was sold at auction last summer.
Wariyaha
This seems to be an unregistered rental property. (since last September) It's supposed to be owner occupied based on the owner occupied covenant when it was sold at auction last summer.
20 Faalladas
myself (Martida)
Jan (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
concerned resident (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
guest (Martida)
Carol Wood (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
guest (Martida)
guest (Martida)
guest (Martida)
guest (Martida)
Eric Schertzing (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
Eric Schertzing (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
Eric Schertzing (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
Eric Schertzing (Registered User)
As I understand it the owner filed the paperwork for a rental license. That should only be on one unit. The other portion needs to be owner occupied. If the ownership is through a land contract it is difficult to know who owns what. Land Contracts do not have to be recorded in Michigan. The process may require the city to see the land contract to confirm owner occupancy.
.
2015-10-09 · Flag
Eric Schertzing (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
La xidhay neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)