Description
This seems to be an unregistered rental property. (since last September) It's supposed to be owner occupied based on the owner occupied covenant when it was sold at auction last summer.
レポーター
This seems to be an unregistered rental property. (since last September) It's supposed to be owner occupied based on the owner occupied covenant when it was sold at auction last summer.
20 Comments
myself (Guest)
Jan (Registered User)
concerned resident (Registered User)
guest (Guest)
Carol Wood (Registered User)
guest (Guest)
guest (Guest)
guest (Guest)
guest (Guest)
Eric Schertzing (Registered User)
neighbor (Registered User)
Eric Schertzing (Registered User)
neighbor (Registered User)
neighbor (Registered User)
Eric Schertzing (Registered User)
neighbor (Registered User)
neighbor (Registered User)
Eric Schertzing (Registered User)
As I understand it the owner filed the paperwork for a rental license. That should only be on one unit. The other portion needs to be owner occupied. If the ownership is through a land contract it is difficult to know who owns what. Land Contracts do not have to be recorded in Michigan. The process may require the city to see the land contract to confirm owner occupancy.
.
2015-10-09 · Flag
Eric Schertzing (Registered User)
neighbor (Registered User)
クローズド neighbor (Registered User)