Description
I was terminated from my employment at the Framingham Public Schools after an investigation that I created a hostile environment with a teacher by raising a topic that was not considered appropriate during a lunch break in which no students were present. I believe it is my right as a former employee to have a copy of the Human Resources investigation report. Emailing requests to those individuals who would expedite delivery of the investigation report to me, I have not received a promising response, suggesting possible retaliation for asserting my right (i.e. I was told my request would be forwarded to the Chief Human Resources Officer by the Staffing Manager, the Chief has not responded at all to my email messages); I suspect the Human Resources Department is secretly censoring the investigation report to conceal potential discrimination violations. I politely request a copy of the investigation report from the Human Resources Department of the Public Schools, which I believe it is my right to have. Please correct me if a public institution reserves the right to secretly censor a report regarding their decision to terminate me. It is my opinion that adequate training would have better informed me of what was expected of me; I was only offered Conflict of Interest training and a digital Handbook, which was quite minimal for the expectations I was held to as a substitute, namely that of a teacher.
also asked...
A. Labor dispute regarding my former employment as a substitute teacher for the public schools. Town Clerk referred me to the Town Council, who referred me to an employment lawyer. A resolution is possible without litigation.
7 Comments
City of Framingham (Verified Official)
Acknowledged Nichol Figueiredo (Registered User)
Closed Nichol Figueiredo (Registered User)
Reopened Christopher Leonard (Registered User)
Christopher Leonard (Registered User)
I received a message from the Human Resources Department one and a half months after being terminated. I was told that there was no investigation report, but that a summary of the investigation could be furnished. I was also told that the employing agent reserved the right to terminate me being an at-will employee; I was not sure whether or not reasonable cause a necessary pre-condition.
My grievance is due to the fact that I disagree with the Department's interpretation of the events that happened two months ago, namely that the topic I brought up in conversation was not obscene or offensive in the same way that making a religious reference in the Pledge of Allegiance is acceptable in school and not considered a hostility.
Closed Christopher Leonard (Registered User)
Christopher Leonard (Registered User)