Amtrak 2040 high speed rail plan should not bypass Stamford, Bridgeport, and New Haven Archived

100-174 Union Ave New Haven, CT Show on Map Hide Map
Move the marker to represent your issue's location. The address will not change.

Reporter

Civic Points: 44320

Issue ID:

217983

Submitted To:

New Haven

Category:

Other

Viewed:

21446 times

Neighborhood:

Hill

Reported:

on

Tagged:

bridge, test

Description

In summer 2012, the Amtrak 2040 New York City to Boston high speed rail plan was revised to include a connection to Providence R.I..

However, the route still bypasses Stamford, Bridgeport, and New Haven in favor of a route through Danbury.

For the latest reports, please see
http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename=am%2FLayout&p=1237608345018&cid=1241245669222

Amtrak's high speed rail system from New York City to Boston should not bypass Connecticut's most economically vibrant cities. Additionally, adding a high speed route through Upstate New York and Danbury, instead of through an area that already has a large amount of existing urban infrastructure, would create more development pressure in environmentally sensitive areas.

We should be focusing our nation's infrastructure investments into our most sustainable, economically competitive urban centers, not into "green fields."

By point of comparison, the planned high speed rail route from Washington DC to NYC passes through the urban centers of Baltimore, Philadelphia, Wilmington, and Newark -- not through rural and semi-rural areas.


Post a New Comment

13 Comments

  • CT Livable Streets Campaign (Registered User)

  • CT Livable Streets Campaign (Registered User)

  • BB (Admin)

  • SomeGuy (Guest)

  • CT Livable Streets Campaign (Registered User)

  • don't worry about it (Guest)

  • Skeptical (Guest)

  • abgoode (Registered User)

  • Bob Guy (Registered User)

  • Toni's choo choo (Guest)

  • Bob Guy (Registered User)

  • Acknowledged City of New Haven (Registered User)

  • Closed LCI Citywide Helper (Verified Official)

Comments are closed for archived issues.