I understand that it is difficult to police such problems everywhere in the city, and that complete compliance can never be reached without citizen cooperation, but there is no excuse for no enforcement at all. The problems in these areas remain at elevated levels with few, if any, police ever seen in the area.

This issue still remains a problem.

To the best of my knowledge, nothing has been done to mediate this problem.

City does not care. Out of sight, out of mind.

It makes me so sad to live in a city where I pay taxes, where I work, and where I volunteer, not to be able to get any kind of positive response on any issue regarding enforcement of the law. I understand how a city can be busy, but, in a city of this size, it certainly seems acceptable to expect an issue to be addressed within a year's time, even if the response is the negative, disrespectful snub this city usually responds with. It is sad to know that the only matters of the law that are important in this city are what the city decides are important, when they decide they are important, and on whom they should be important. I guess it is important for citizens to know that they have no voice unless the city allows it, and unless the city decides that they are important enough to be heard. The rest of us must just deal with problems on our own as if no law existed.

Speed enforcement is needed all over the city.

No improvement made. As a matter of fact, no acknowledgment made, either.

The city does not care at all.

The city won't enforce laws, but now they want citizens to pay to fix the roads. Give us safe streets, and then we'll pay to fix the roads.

Speed enforcement is needed all over town.

I sincerely believe that the people charged with enforcing the laws in the city of Arvada believe that they are good, honest, and doing a good job. The unfortunate aspect of that is that they also think they are entrusted with interpreting the law, too. The reality of that means they enforce the law unevenly, and unfairly because they decide which laws will be enforced, when they will be enforced, and on whom. If they like you, you are wealthy, or you are related, then the laws rarely apply. If, however, you are not in their "group," then anything goes, and they will "find" a law, or some obscure aspect of the law to fit the situation they need to cite you.
It is so sad because the "think" they are being righteous when all they are doing is persecuting those citizens who not fit their "mold."

Still a problem all over the city with little, if anything, being done.

A lack of speed enforcement, and the Uniform Traffic Code in general is a problem throughout this city. I am convinced that most of the city's officers are not aware of the code, just enforce randomly on personal whims, and do not feel the code applies to them at all in any circumstance.

Speed enforcement is a problem all over the city.

Especially with the increased population, and increased traffic, this problem has become even more serious.

no comment just close it.

No issue should be closed until a resolution is achieved. As long as this is a problem, there is an issue, and it should remain open. The safety of pedestrians and other drivers is at stake.

record it on video, get a plate number, and call the police. otherwise have a cup of cocoa, and watch a matlock rerun.

The problem has not been resolved. My tax dollars pay law enforcement to control these things. I am already using more of my personal time than I should be.

so go enjoy your personal time, and leave the forums alone

This issue has neither been addressed or resolved, and should remain open until such time as it is proper authorities have the time to deal with it.

I drove by there today, and saw a patrolmen sitting there. So the matter should remain closed.

Nope. This issue was mistakenly closed. The problem has not been resolved. Leave it open.

nope, as I stated before, the city is patrolling as required

It is sad that the city cannot resolve this issue with "patrolling as required," and that their patrols are completely ineffectual in doing anything to curtail the problem, let alone resolve it. The city was "patrolling as required" when the issue was opened, but that was not a resolution then, and it is not a resolution now. Instead of closing the issue and assuming the procedure that did not work before is working now, let's wait and see how well patrolling as required works. Maybe the city should look into upping patrols on the basis that "as required" isn't working. When the city studies that, then, maybe, the issue can be resolved.

The city is patrolling as required. This is spam sir, I am asking you one last time, to reconsider your consistent bashing, and spamming the city, and it's staff.

This is not spam, and this is not a solution. I am a taxpaying, law-abiding citizen, and I deserve the same courtesies and attention as all other citizens. I'm okay if the City does not want to deal with this problem, but if nothing is going to be done, then the problem isn't resolved. Leave this problem open until someone decides a better way to deal with the problem. That's all. The problem has been open over eight years, and the city's efforts to resolve the issue are "business as usual," or, in other words, they don't care. I'm fine with that, and quite used to it in this city. Leave it at that, and leave it open. People need to know that the city does not care about speed enforcement in town, and that they had better keep their eyes open for speeders when they drive.

The city is well aware of your great concern with Law and order sir. They patrol the area, on a regular basis. You may view citations at city hall to quench your thirst for justice.

It is not a solution to an issue simply to tell the person reporting the issue to shut up, to tell him he should run for office, to tell him he should take his issue before City Council, or simply to refuse to do anything at all about it.
If nothing is going to be done, that's fine, and expected, but it is not a reason to "close" any issue. Do nothing, if that is your inclination, but leave the issue open until such time as someone decides it is worthwhile to enforce the law.

Stan, you have posted the same answer for all the closed tickets. These issues have been noted, investigated by the city, and after due diligence been addressed or left for more pressing issues. Continuing to spout the same answer is in fact spam. These items are closed.

I contend that none of these issues has either been investigated, or resolved. I have seen no visible evidence at all that anything has been done. It is not a solution to do nothing, and "say" you did. Again, I am fine with the inactivity of the city in regard to code as long as it applies equally and fairly to all, and as long as no one tries to claim he or she resolved an issue when, in fact, nothing at all was ever even attempted.
Don't do anything if that is you inclination, but don't close the issue because you choose that course of action in lieu of any actual resolution. We citizens are all used to the way the city enforces code with favorable treatment to some, but we do not have to accept that as a viable resolution. We citizens still have the right to expect equal and fair treatment under the law, and the right to expect that part of our tax dollars will go to enforce that equal and fair treatment. It's not that much to ask.

It's closed

It's closed, but why? There is no reason to close it. Nothing has been done about it. When you close it for no reason at all, it gives the impression that it has been dealt with when, in actuality, nothing has been done. It is much better if you are going to nothing, or if you are helpless to do anything just to say so, and leave the issue open.

This issue has been open for over eight years, and there has been no change. Leave it open another eight years if you can't fix it. Eventually, someone will take note, and someone will take it to the people with the authority to correct the problem. It is not your fault that you are powerless to do anything about these issues, but do not put citizens in further danger by neglecting your job. Leave the issue open for the good of the people with the hopes that someone, some time will decide that maybe it is time to make the streets safer for people.

It's closed because the required patrols are taking place. If you can prove to the city, that there is not sufficient police presence, have video, or accident, or traffic data, please bring it to the City of Arvada Municipal courthouse, or again, bring it forth at a city council meeting.