RFS 18764 assigned. If received outside of normal business hours, we will investigate this issue on the next business day.

SCormier designou esta questão a SCormier

Acknowledged - assigning to Technical Services Division.

Per Technical Services: the contractor's MUTCD compliant signs have been repeatedly stolen during the legally permitted obstruction period. Contractor has been talked with and will be acquiring another sign package and will be remain fully MUTCD compliant - issue closed.

Public Works, I have a photo of the sign at Bradley St. leaning against a tree facing the wrong way! It was not stolen. It is just poorly designed and installed. The sign at the actual site literally directs pedestrians to walk out into rt. 7 traffic with viewlines blocked by the construction trailer. I have video of a child following this sign and walking out into traffic. Did Public works approve the sign at the site?Please take our safety concerns seriously.

Here is the sign at Bradley St. It is facing the wrong direction. It is by no means "MUTCD compliant."

Here is the sign at the actual site directing pedestrian into traffic which they can't see because of the contractor's trailer. This is an absolute violation of MUTCD standards.

Acknowledged - assigning to Assistant Director for Technical Services.

An adult and child following the arrow into traffic with sightlines blocked. Dozens of children walk this route daily.

The above video link failed. Here it is again.

Issue 3671357 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue.

Brian, with all due respect, if it's dangerous, it's dangerous to everyone. Please stop playing "the children" card.

Sidewalk has been reopened. Issue closed