Description
What happened with sub par golf was a disgrace, and now we're saddled with a large storefront homeless encampment. I'd like to see the city take a more active role in ensuring out-pricing existing tenants in our business districts is heavily disincentivized.
also asked...
Q. Please choose from the following:
A. Business Retention and Expansion
A. Business Retention and Expansion
Q. Please describe your request here:
A. No Answer Given
A. No Answer Given
4 Comments
City of Alameda (Verified Official)
Creighton Chang (Registered User)
I don't own any property, as I am a renter. Therefore, please excuse my very naive questions.
If the owner of a business property on Park Street has a high monthly mortgage, property taxes, maintenance cost, and insurance cost, and if the city disincentivizes the raising of rents, then how will the property owner be expected to pay their bills each month?
Alternatively, if a person purchased one of these properties as a business venture to earn a living by renting and maintaining a property, and the city disincentivizes the raising of rents, then how will current property owners ever expect to be able to sell their property if new owners already know that they can not purchase the property and be able to come close to breaking even each month?
Maybe I'm very naive; but I'm definitely open to learning how other people think.
Junebug (Registered User)
I agree! It was a cute place and brought folks to Alameda from all over the Bay. It is now a blight just like Pagano’s former building on Lincoln. Many places that made Alameda desirable and unique got pushed out.
We stop have so much from the pinball museum to our movie theatre which in my opinion is aesthetically, the best of the Bay.
I’m eating dinner at a sidewalk cafe in Benicia visiting and it makes me sad because it reminds me of what Alameda used to be. Alameda could be so much more... Mayberry. It’s quickly losing its former charm! Instead of building these ugly mega complexes as the Emeryville-style branded by development as “small” (?) shopping center at Target, focus on Park and Webster and the little neighborhoods in between. That’s what makes (and made) Alameda nice. Mom and Pop shops!
Take care of what we have now. That means roads, crime, infrastructure before we allow this other homogenized development to come in.
And, why on heavens are we allowing City Hall to okay all this mega-development?!!! Turning Southshore shopping center into a monstrosity of tall buildings, something like Emeryville (residences with retail below). Word has it that developer will start by removing Sushi House and developing that area. They don’t seem to care much about the earthquake problems with the landfill there, nor the sea level rise, blocking views from the public along the beautiful beachfront drive and blocking light behind these buildings.
I say we be like Monterrey she say NO to this nasty development.
TheyreCensoringOurCommentsOnThisSite (Registered User)