Description
There should be a traffic light placed here for the safety of pedestrians and proper flow of traffic. When a train gets into the station and everyone comes up to the street level, you can have 50+ people crossing the street at the same time. It’s frustrating for drivers during busy times of the day at this intersection and the flow of traffic needs to be better managed for all. I know pedestrians have the right of way but this is a busy area with lots of buses, trolleys, trucks, bikes, cars, etc and it’s an area for an accident waiting to happen.
also asked...
A. No Answer Given
A. No Answer Given
A. No Answer Given
A. No Answer Given
8 Comments
Traffic - BMcK (Streets) (Verified Official)
Colin (Registered User)
Display Name Blocked (1533347) (Registered User)
Colin (Registered User)
Why isn't it a viable solution? There's no garages and only one or two parking spots (which could be converted to delivery/truck/bus parking) on that stretch of road (between Ames and Hayward) There's no destination for private vehicles (delivery trucks and buses would obviously need to be exempted) on that segment and numerous other roads that are parallel. And it's been demonstrated during the school season without ill effects!
What isn't viable is continuing to encourage use of private vehicles on a daily basis during a climate emergency that also creates detrimental health effects to anyone near them. Installing a traffic light would probably just encourage drivers to speed up to beat it (not to mention all the drivers that are always running lights and crosswalks!) I drive too sometimes when necessary, and have friends who drive, but there's a time and place for it (outside Kendall station during rush hour isn't it!)
Traffic - DB (Signals) (Registered User)
Acknowledged Traffic - DB (Signals) (Registered User)
Closed Traffic - PB (Engineering) (Registered User)
A detailed study was performed by a traffic engineering consultant as part of the design process for the Main Street reconstruction project to determine the best configuration for this crosswalk. The study indicated that pedestrian volumes at the intersection are more than double the vehicular volumes, and that the vast majority (over 90%) of pedestrians did not comply with the DON'T WALK signal. Pedestrians crossing against a green light are not expected by drivers, and therefore represent a much more significant safety hazard than those crossing at an unsignalized crosswalk
Given these data, the study recommended that the signal be removed and the crosswalk improved for pedestrian safety. Improvements included a raised intersection, curb extensions to reduce the length of the crosswalk, enhanced signage, and improved lighting. These features have combined to create a much safer pedestrian environment than was provided with the traffic signal.
Thank you for your report.
Ryan Frazer (Registered User)