Hãy mời hàng xóm và bạn bè của quý vị sử dụng SeeClickFix để họ có thể đăng bài, bình chọn và bình luận về các vấn đề trong thành phố và khu vực xung quanh của quý vị.
There is already a traffic light 300 feet from this exit ramp. Installing a second light so close would cause serious problems with traffic flow on the local streets.
But then what to do? It is dangerous for those waiting to turn left as traffic can be backed up on to the highway. Others do illegal u-turns out of the office complex across the street.
Is an intermittent light, one only operational at morning rush hour, the solution?
I know the Bernards Township Committee once discussed this concern. Uncertain the outcome.
There is a simple solution but it would be unpopular with the folks complaining about this exit. Eliminate the left turn option altogether. A second, albeit much more expensive, option would be an overpass crossing over Mt. Airy and 287 linking with the 287 North bound ramp onto Mt. Airy east.
Of course if someone could invent a time machine we could go back and let the planners know that the Bernards Twsp area would expand far beyond anyones expectations in 1960.
There is a simple solution but it would be unpopular with the folks complaining about this exit. Eliminate the left turn option altogether. A second, albeit much more expensive, option would be an overpass crossing over Mt. Airy and 287 linking with the 287 North bound ramp onto Mt. Airy east.
Of course if someone could invent a time machine we could go back and let the planners know that the Bernards Twsp area would expand far beyond anyones expectations in 1960.
There is a simple solution but it would be unpopular with the folks complaining about this exit. Eliminate the left turn option altogether. A second, albeit much more expensive, option would be an overpass crossing over Mt. Airy and 287 linking with the 287 North bound ramp onto Mt. Airy east.
Of course if someone could invent a time machine we could go back and let the planners know that the Bernards Twsp area would expand far beyond anyones expectations in 1960.
7 Bình luậns
Emma (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Chris Lewis (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Hellofrom (Khách)
Is an intermittent light, one only operational at morning rush hour, the solution?
I know the Bernards Township Committee once discussed this concern. Uncertain the outcome.
Chris Lewis (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
There is a simple solution but it would be unpopular with the folks complaining about this exit. Eliminate the left turn option altogether. A second, albeit much more expensive, option would be an overpass crossing over Mt. Airy and 287 linking with the 287 North bound ramp onto Mt. Airy east.
Of course if someone could invent a time machine we could go back and let the planners know that the Bernards Twsp area would expand far beyond anyones expectations in 1960.
Chris Lewis (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
There is a simple solution but it would be unpopular with the folks complaining about this exit. Eliminate the left turn option altogether. A second, albeit much more expensive, option would be an overpass crossing over Mt. Airy and 287 linking with the 287 North bound ramp onto Mt. Airy east.
Of course if someone could invent a time machine we could go back and let the planners know that the Bernards Twsp area would expand far beyond anyones expectations in 1960.
Chris Lewis (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
There is a simple solution but it would be unpopular with the folks complaining about this exit. Eliminate the left turn option altogether. A second, albeit much more expensive, option would be an overpass crossing over Mt. Airy and 287 linking with the 287 North bound ramp onto Mt. Airy east.
Of course if someone could invent a time machine we could go back and let the planners know that the Bernards Twsp area would expand far beyond anyones expectations in 1960.
Đã đóng Vicki (Khách)