This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Your service request (#373946) has been closed.

Notes: Case Closed
Service Request Resolved
On Wednesday, November 13, 2019, a site visit was conducted by 277 for a 311 report of a business operating without a Certificate of
Occupancy. According to HCAD, the owners of record are listed. Furthermore, HCAD lists this property as a residential, single-family dwelling. Upon arrival at this location, 277 observed a two-story, wood frame, brick veneer, single-family, residential dwelling. 277 then approached the front door of the residence and rang the doorbell,
however, there was no answer. No business advertisement signs were observed on the premises. No persons were observed on the premises at the time of this investigation. After being unable to make contact with any persons at this location, it is undetermined if a business is
being operated from the residence. 277 then posted the first, 15-day notice to apply for/obtain the Certificate of Occupancy on the window
glass of the front door of the residence, instructing the recipient of the notice to contact 277 to discuss the details of this investigation.
On 11/13/2019, at approximately 1220 hours, 277 was contacted by homeowner in regard to receiving the NOD. She advised 277 that she has a stalker in her neighborhood who is filing complaints against her. She stated that she is the former president of the local civic club and that she is aware that a business can not be operated from her residence. She further reported that no business is being operated at this location. She stated that she does not feel comfortable allowing a stranger (City of Houston Employee) in her residence for occupancy verification. 277 advised her that he would discuss this matter with 255 and contact her with a response on the next business day.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.