Deskripsyon
A dozen or more bikers paused at this red light, looked around, then all blew right through it.
Either you want to be treated like other vehicles and respected as such, or not. Don't make other cyclists look bad by playing by your own rules. If you want to share the road, then obey the traffic laws.
50 Komentos
City of New Haven Neighbor (Panauhin)
Res (Rehistradong User)
Walt (Panauhin)
Martin (Panauhin)
City of New Haven Neighbor (Panauhin)
Guest (Panauhin)
Res (Rehistradong User)
City of New Haven Neighbor (Panauhin)
Res (Rehistradong User)
City of New Haven Neighbor (Panauhin)
Res (Rehistradong User)
Untrue.
http://www.dmv.org/ct-connecticut/safety-laws.php
On Oct. 1st using a cell phone eve while stopped at a red light will be enforced, but as of now, it's not. You're wrong.
Res (Rehistradong User)
Martin (Panauhin)
Colin Caplan (Rehistradong User)
As the leader of this bike gang, I can tell you that we followed a very safe and careful route 12.5 miles around the city. At this intersection of Chapel and State Street, you will notice that the walk signal had begun to count down, as clearly shown in your photograph. I would suggest that you investigate your own reasons for reporting our amazing adventure, and perhaps pop on a bike and see what it is like to actually bike around on the streets. We had zero incidents during our six hour tour and created quite an example of how to ride safely and respectfully through the paved rights of way.
Guest (Panauhin)
Res (Rehistradong User)
Colin, actually I had my camera out because I was so impressed by the group, and thought it was a great idea to represent responsible cycling, as the group was at least the size of a large SUV...and was a great awareness-raising moment, it had much more of an impact than a single rider or pair has ever had on me.
Then you rode through the red light. Is it legal for a car to decide to stop sitting at a light because the walk light is on? No. It's not legal for bikes, either. You're supposed to obey all traffic signals, just like a car.
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=2314&q=438854
Share the road.
livin here (Panauhin)
They should have waited for the crosswalk to stop and move as a vehicle of traffic as they are defined in the statutes. I hate when all the Yale Students fly through the lights while the crosswalk is going. I agree that if the car has to wait then so do bikes- especially on prospect near the whale.
BUT I must say though that I am impressed that the large groups of bicyclist I do see obey all the traffic laws and move safely through the streets. Let this be a learning lesson to our Yale Free for Alls.
Isinara guest (Panauhin)
Reopened Res (Rehistradong User)
mapninja (Rehistradong User)
Res (Rehistradong User)
You'd be wrong about that.
I didn't really buy the "cyclists are arrogant" hype that I have heard in New Haven until now. You post about a car running a red light, and everyone agrees. You do it about a bike, and you get all KINDS of belly-aching and denial.
Isinara Guest (Panauhin)
Reopened Res (Rehistradong User)
Guest (Panauhin)
Isinara enuf point made (Panauhin)
FairHavenRes (Rehistradong User)
Isinara walker (Panauhin)
Reopened Res (Rehistradong User)
Isinara . (Panauhin)
Reopened Walt (Panauhin)
Isinara Walt (Panauhin)
Reopened Walt (Panauhin)
Someone is impersonating me. Did not change my mind.. Was my supposed email address the same on both posts?
If so something odd is going on. If not the ID system is messed up
Department of Transportation, Traffic and Parking (Rehistradong User)
Isinara Res (Rehistradong User)
Colin Caplan (Panauhin)
Res. (Panauhin)
FairHavener (Rehistradong User)
But Department of Transportation, your own materials say that cycling should consider themselves pedestrians in crosswalks, so long as they yield to pedestrians. I think this needs SERIOUS clarification, as every cyclist I know believes it is DOT law that it is fine to cross when the pedestrian signal is on, so long as they yield. It also makes a lot of sense.
http://www.ct.gov/dot/LIB/dot/documents/dbikes/bike_safely.pdf
David Streever (Rehistradong User)
This issue should be closed because:
CT State Statute says that bicyclists, unless specifically forbade by municipal statute, are allowed on:
Crosswalks
Sidewalks
The Statute continues to say that crosswalks & sidewalks are different, and must be explicitly disallowed--that a prohibition on one does not constitute a prohibition on another.
The New Haven Municipal Ordinance reads quite clearly that bicycles are not allowed on SIDEWALKS: it explicitly refers only to sidewalks and not crosswalks or other pedestrian right of ways.
The State Statute does say that bicyclists in crosswalks/sidewalks must not harm pedestrians.
Bicycles and cars are not identical, and no one really wants that. Bicycles DO have a right to be in the road--as do pedestrians and baby strollers--and there is no specific law requiring them to behave identical to automobiles. There are roughly a dozen laws demonstrating that they are not the same as automobiles, and the law states they have the "rights" of an automobile--not all the responsibilities.
If you don't like it, I suggest you lobby legislative branches, not post ideology on SCF.
David Streever (Rehistradong User)
The Department of Transportation is clearly wrong on this: I've posted the exact statute with number for them several times, from the State website.
New Haven judges have thrown out contested cases stating that the bicyclist broke no law in the event of a ticket.
I'm not sure how much clearer this could be: while maybe some folks wish that the law worked that way, a judge setting precedent usually over-rules personal opinions.
Mike (Panauhin)
Riding a bike or driving a car in New Haven is never safe Colin, at least not while the city pours thousands into bike racks near Yale while ignoring extremely dangerous unlicensed drivers that are all over the roads driving as if they are headed to the ER with a dying passenger.
If I was a biker in New Haven on a regular basis I would be running red lights too.
Res (Rehistradong User)
Streever, this isn't about crosswalks or sidewalks. It's about running a red light.
From the DOT:
The same laws that apply to motorists apply to cyclists!
On the Road:
- Obey all traffic control devices
Pretty sure a traffic light is a traffic control device. So red means red, bike or car.
http://www.ct.gov/dot/cwp/view.asp?a=2314&q=438854
CommuterChica (Panauhin)
David Streever (Rehistradong User)
Res:
According to the people featured in the photo, the pedestrian crossing light was on, so what they did is--per CT statute--legal.
While someone at ConnDOT may wish that all the laws which apply to cars applied to cyclists, they do not.
I know I said I wouldn't post the CT statute again--I'm really getting tired of doing this for people because it is available via google--but this is the actual law, not marketing language or a slogan:
http://www.ct.gov/dot/LIB/dot/documents/dbikes/14-286.pdf
This is literally all you need.
Please read section e1:
(e) As used in this section: (1) "Sidewalk" means any sidewalk laid out as such by any town, city or borough, and any walk which is reserved by custom for the use of pedestrians, or which has been specially prepared for their use. "Sidewalk" does not include crosswalks and does not include footpaths
Let me emphasis that the law states that "Sidewalk" does not include crosswalks
The rest of the statute explicitly states that cyclists MAY use crosswalks and sidewalks, EXCEPT when a municipal ordinance denies that right, but states that the municipal ordinance MUST be consistent with this statute.
As this statute specifically makes clear, crosswalks & sidewalks--in these regards--are not the same thing.
Therefore, the local ordinance in New Haven prohibiting sidewalk riding does not prohibit use of crosswalks, provided that an "audible signal" is made by the cyclists before they overtake a pedestrian. The municipal ordinance clearly defines that "Sidewalks" are not permitted for riders over 12 I believe--or adults accompanying those child riders--but it doesn't mention crosswalks at all. Presumably, when they drafted the law, they were aware of the limitations (they'd have to be), so the people who crafted the law must not have wanted to ban riders from crosswalks.
Now, Res, you may disagree that the ped crossing signal was on, but I can't see how you'd know that from the angle of your photo. When I look at that photo, I see cars at a complete stop on the intersecting road, and one of the riders who crossed has attested that indeed the ped signal was on.
It seems to fit the photo, so I'm accepting that point of view in my spirited defense.
If you have other information proving that the riders were indeed breaking the law, I think that may justify reopening the conversation, but without that I'm not sure what point you are making, except that it annoyed you to see the group of cyclists ride through the intersection.
Why does it annoy you so much? What is their potential to kill and maim someone else? Do you also post pictures of cars running red lights, or do you not think that is as serious as this?
Ben (Rehistradong User)
The bicyclists are in ta traffic lane in the street, not in the crosswalk (except perhaps the one in yellow, farthest to the right). The crosswalk exists between the white painted lines to the right of the group of bicycles.
So they are bicycles, in the street, crossing against the red light. Does that make a difference for the CT statutes?
Res (Rehistradong User)
When I first posted this, I was not aware of the municipal laws which apparently trump state laws.
However, this thread has done nothing but instill me with a newfound dislike of cyclists, solely from the hostile attitude of people like Streever and the rest, who either closed the thread maliciously or sounded off without bothering to link to the statute. I've already looked it up, Streever, but maybe you should go back through and read my actual posts, because what you are asking me above is answered in them.
I've heard of cyclists being arrogant and aggravating in New Haven before, and this really drove it home for me. Nice work. Next time try being civil, and I might have some respect for you.
Reopened Walt (Panauhin)
Usually Streever (except on his 2 a/m/ escapade a while back) is a very strong advocate for safe cycling. This time he seems out to confuse or mislead
While it is true , as he says, that bikists need not obey ALL laws re car operation, they must obey all car operating rules unless there is a specific exception for bicycles, (or as in the opposite , localities have p0ut in extra rules for special restriction on their activities--like sidewalks etc.)
As I read the Statutes, and as Streever has said in the past, most car rules also apply to bicycles This time it seems he advocates for little safety and tries falsely to indicate that bikists in general are exempt from the rules for cars.- or do I misread?
I liked the original safety - conscious Streever better
Good job, Rev
Zinger (Panauhin)
Streever:
Let's break this down properly:
Cyclists can ride their bicycle through a crosswalk, as long as they yield to pedestrians and give an audible signal to alert them of their presence.
Cyclists over the age of 12 cannot ride their bicycle on a sidewalk.
ok? I could list the other statutes/ordinances as well but these should suffice. Well, maybe I'll just say one more thing.
Cyclists are breaking the law if they ride their bike through an intersection (in a vehicular travel lane) while the light is red.
Where were the cyclists positioned? It looks to me as if they are in the travel lane. Wait, let me look at the photo again, hold on a sec.........................yup. They are definitely in the travel lane and not in the crosswalk. Perhaps you want to go back and reread the statutes? The ones you are so tired of posting and linking all the time.
Isinara Department of Transportation, Traffic and Parking (Rehistradong User)
Kathleen Galo (Rehistradong User)
gu (Panauhin)