Did you see the obstruction permit? Duh, it's moving day.

Obstruction permits are generally not issued for moving day. There is no exception in MN 169.34 for moving day.

Enforcement will likely not respond to movers. It’s a trivial small minded complaint targeting movers and signaling that bicyclists should not be paid attention to.

It's small and trivial until you're dealing with it on every block while commuting. It's trivial if you're an able-bodied person comfortable biking with traffic but not if your younger or elderly and rely on the bike lanes to feel safe. Bike lanes are for bikes, not for loading, not for delivery, not for moving, not for picking up a friend.

Most of the moving trucks on 27th ave, including this one have obstruction permits, contrary to what was said earlier. Bike lanes were put in with very little thought for moving, delivery and construction. Enforcement recognizes this and as such, you won't get any love from the parking police. Keep wasting your time.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Would you like to provide a link to said obstruction permit? They should be publicly viewable on the cities website. Yes there needs to be a place for delivery and such but that place is not the bike lane. There are ample lots. Some cases may require forward thinking to use vehicles capable of legally parking within the given infrastructure. This comes down to two things: it's against the law and it puts the most vulnerable road users in danger for the momentary convenience of motorists.

Or perhaps even *gasps and clutches pearls* delivery drivers such as UPS FEDEX and USPS might have to park across the street in the dirt lot and use a hand cart. OH THE HORROR!

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Thanks for posting the threat in a public forum. I sure will take a picture for the 311 report. Have a nice day.

Waste of time, Jacob. That is ok, while you're doing this you're not harassing other bicyclists and pedestrians.

Pedestrian, I'm very confused by your post. My concern is for the most vulnerable road users: cyclists and pedestrians. I make the 311 reports and take photos for crowdsourced databases like Bike Lane Uprising and Safe Lanes. The goal is to have actual data regarding bike lane obstructions when interacting with elected representatives and city officials.

Your goal is to cause trouble. Being the building manager my tenants deserve a convenient place to park.

I thought one of you might be the building manager. Your do deserve a place to park.

There is the dirt lot across the street and the lots adjacent to you're building. Maybe you could suspend resident assigned parking a few days a month to facilitate move in or move out, and deliveries.

I'd think we are in agreement that all of these new apartments going up need dedicated pick-up drop-off and deliver locations. Using the bike lane for this though is illegal and not safe for anyone. The stretch of road by these apartments is one of the only N-S streets with a bike lane that connects the numerous trails from E and W River Parkway at Franklin Ave Bridge to the UMN transit way.

Actually, whoever has been using my names is impersonating me. They may or may not be a building manager. I'm certainly not. But hey, Calvin and his moving van are long gone and so is this post. Cheers!

You do realize when you change your name, it changes it across the platform and retroactive to all previous posts? I'm glad I included what I did in my public data requests for 311 reports and parking citations over the past few years.

Who is on first?

Who is on first.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Really? Here is what Cam Gordon the council member for the area had to say on twitter: https://twitter.com/CameronAGordon/status/1301186250632761346?s=20

We talked to Lisa Goodman

She's not the council person for the area of the arrow apartments. Got a link or screencap of her reply? I thought she was a fan of bike lanes. She's been pretty good in discussions re Lyndale Ave ped/bike concerns.

my apologies to Lisa Bender. I done messed up that reply.

This was reported 11 days ago. I told you parking enforcement doesn't care.

Ya know, if there is a rogue parking enforcement agent that'll come out in the stats from the public data request I just got, and others I'm filing. I'd love to have the job of parking enforcement agent. . . if I could do it by bike. Maybe it's still open because they're investigating the threat aspect? I really don't know. People who can do something about this do actually seem to care and are aware of the situation.

As the building manager, Swanson Meats delivery driver and doorman at Rick's Cabaret I feel that you are too aggressive with your campaign to end bike lane parking. Do you realize that some people have mobility challenges and need places to park. I've never met a disabled bicyclist.

Haha. It's been six months and parking enforcement still hasn't checked on this. Keep reporting on your precious bike lane.

It's been 9 months and Parking Enforcement still hasn't checked on this.

The vehicle has been gone for 9 months. It is no longer there.

Has this been confirmed by Parking Enforcement?

This was originally reported on July 31, 2020. Do you believe the same Uhaul has been parked there since then? That would be curious, indeed.

I won't know until it's been confirmed

Take this as confirmation.

Wow. Over 28 months and it's still parked there.

It's been almost 3 years. Have you had a chance to check on this yet? Is the truck still there?

Your service request (#412663) has been closed.

Notes: Case Closed.
Closed date : Fri Jul 31 10:45:00 CDT 2020
Case Resolved
Vehicle Gone On Arrival