Description
Mark Nix Plumbing Trucks are always blocking the sidewalk every weekday.
It is a complete blind spot to walk out into Sankey from behind his commercial vehicles.
But there is rarely enough room to even squeeze by on the sidewalk. One day I bumped into his passenger mirror while trying to squeeze through his truck and the building wall
And he became belligerent and started screaming at me. I have pictures of his trucks on the sidewalk that go back years. In my opinion he simply does not care about anyone else’s safety over his own laziness.
44 Comments
taxpayer (Guest)
Safety over Laziness (Guest)
Guest (Guest)
Closed truthbetold (Guest)
Reopened Safety over Laziness (Guest)
The cars on Churchview should be reported as well! But, just because other people get away with breaking the law does not mean it should not be enforced for anyone. There are several reasons this One property is has set itself apart.
1. It is commercial and has up to 3 vehicles blocking the sidewalk at any given time. (over 30 feet of sidewalk)
2. It is on the corner of a busy intersection. Cars traveling up Sankey have no stop sign and no reason to slow at the crest where Mark Nix trucks would force you to enter the road.(in fact most cars accelerate up hill)
3. This property owner has now engaged me in a violent manner.
4. They have been blocking the sidewalk more frequently then in the past.
5. They always block the entire sidewalk leaving no space to pass at all and never even tuck their mirrors.
6. The terrain on the other side of the vehicle is a sloped grass hill. It’s very dangerous when wet.
As of yesterday I was harassed by a group of Mark Nix employees and physically threatened by one of them for taking a picture of an illegally parked truck as I walked by. I did file a police report. People have a right to walk on unobstructed PUBLIC sidewalks without having the fear of being attacked by adjoining property owners that do not respect the law. Be careful if you have to walk by there.
Can't deny the facts (Guest)
It's actually a Borough code that they should not be parking there, so regardless if they are on the sidewalk, street, etc. they are still in violation of code. Look at section 154-7 "General Regulations" part B., which clearly states, "No commercial vehicle is permitted to park on a Borough street in a residential district unless engaged in a business activity, which parking shall be reasonably limited as to time and to the nature of business activity." In addition to this, part C. states, "Each commercial vehicle, if it can not be parked in a fully enclosed garage or other backyard enclosure as required in Subsection A above, must be registered with the Brentwood Police Department and must have displayed, on the rear window of the vehicle, a permit obtained from the issuing authority and authorizing parking of such vehicle in the driveway of the residence of the vehicle owner or operator or on the street in front of the residence of the vehicle owner or operator; provided, however, that tow trucks, dump trucks, construction vehicles and construction equipment may not be permitted under this § 154-7C, or under any other provision of this section."
Here is the link if you are curious: http://www.ecode360.com/6197642
From the picture you posted, I don't see any permits on the rear window. It's a shame that you are being harassed when these folks are clearly breaking the law. It is a dangerous intersection and school will be starting back in about a month. It's a shame that the kids will have to walk into the busy street to get around. I would contact the Borough about the specific code and see if Mark Nix is in violation. They have it in writing on their website, so they should be enforcing it!
Closed truthbetold (Guest)
truthbetold (Guest)
Reopened Stop closing the issue Mark! (Guest)
Closed truthbetold (Guest)
truthbetold (Guest)
Reopened Safety over Laziness (Guest)
I have never seen them parked on the sidewalk overnight either. But I'm never in the area at night and they have no right to park there ever, not for 5 minutes nor for 1.
You are correct there is a garage door and a driveway curb cut to access that door.
Driveway curb cuts are for giving access to a private driveways or garages, They are used to cross completely through the sidewalk onto an area that is not a public access. Parking in a driveway with any part of a vehicle in the public side walk is illegal. There is no such thing as a loading zone on a public sidewalk. A loading zone would still require you to park along the curb designated by the zoning. It is not a loading zone. But since you mentioned that big garage door that is designed to be driven into. Hey here is a crazy thought. Use it! Pull into the private garage completely off the sidewalk and load whatever you need. See you did actually have something useful to contribute.
I filed the police report over the physical threat, I am using this borough provided forum to report the parking issues as it is designed for. I do agree that since there is an option for users to close an issue, it is intended to be used if a user has solved the issue. Such would be the case if you cited a code that allows someone appropriate a public sidewalk as a loading zone. Which you will not because it would violate the Americans with Disabilities Act. My complaints can seem a waste of time to you, but they are not to me and the trucks are clearly breaking the law. I will reopen every time you close it without showing a written legal document that allows him to block public access.
I am not some “creepy ” person walking around peoples property stalking them and taking pictures, I am walking on a PUBLIC sidewalk and taking pictures of ILLEGAL obstructions as I walk the route needed to get to my destination. Something that takes no special time, effort, or thought on my part. I do this to protect myself from these situations. If I were to be forced into the street and injured by oncoming traffic, I most likely could no record the scene at that point and I would have no evidence of the property owners liability. In fact if I where running into the street just because I wanted to, I could be sued for causing the accident myself. In my opinion it is the prudent thing to do when conditions are unsafe. If you would like to know more about the First Amendment right to photography you can read it here. http://www.aclu.org/free-speech/know-your-rights-photographers
Closed truthbetold (Guest)
Reopened Brentwood Resident (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Closed Confused citizen (Guest)
Brentwood Resident (Guest)
truthbetold (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Reopened Brentwood Resident (Guest)
Safety over Laziness (Guest)
I am the original poster, I have only posted under one name here, some people seem to
think other peoples post are mine. I never accused anyone here of being Mark.
Some people think I have a personal issue with Mark, which I did not before he started harassing me. I have walked that route for years. I have taken pictures of unsafe conditions for years, to protect myself if there is an accident. Not just of Mark Nix, but all
obstructions in my route. I don’t want to be the person to call to report people everyday, so I don’t, as I can usually make my way around. Most people leave some room to get around though. Mark does not, none the less I walked around his vehicle for years. It was not until I bumped his truck one day and he had a violent outburst that I decided it had escalated to the point of me being the one to report it here. I would have reported anyone else along my route under these circumstances. There was no personal issue.
Truthbetold posted above - “If he had to come out and complain about you "bumping his mirror" I'm sure you did more than just bump”
It’s a piece of glass and plastic, if you are implying I hit it intentionally, I would have broken it.
You have seen the pictures, if you were looking at this unbiased you would see how hard it would be to get by there.
Another user posted about more important crimes to worry about. Well that actually is my concern at this point. I was harassed and threatened by employees as I walked by and took a picture. I don’t know about you, but I think groups of threatening people are a real concern. Whether it is a group of people hanging on a corner or a group of Mark Nix employees trying to intimidate me.
After having my person threatened, yes I do now have a personal issue with those people.
I don’t see how that is odd. I was not the one who engaged first either time. I have not said anything that is untrue here, therefore I have not slandered anyone. I posted pictures and the law is clear. I simply would like to be able to walk on a public sidewalk and get home.
Closed Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Reopened Brentwood Resident (Guest)
Brentwood Resident (Guest)
Closed truthbetold (Guest)
truthbetold (Guest)
truthbetold (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Reopened Brentwood Resident (Guest)
Closed truthbetold (Guest)
I believe this company is being harassed. Stupid posts and comments can negatively impact a company's reputation even though it has nothing to do with the work they perform by stating all the comments made from above. There is no issue here and the poster and yourself should go and find something better to do with your time.
Confused citizen (Guest)
Confused citizen (Guest)
Reopened Safety over Laziness (Guest)
Confused citizen – “Also none of the photos the original poster posted show anyone being affected by the trucks.”
I try to keep other people out of my pictures most of the time and just take a picture of the illegally blocking items. But this time I included a picture of someone other than myself forced into the street by illegally parked trucks. But I know that no matter what evidence of fact I present here some parties will just keep demanding more ( that’s only one other person you showed, show us more, show us someone in the street at 3am….ect)
I’m getting out of the debate now. I will keep opening this post if it is closed until, the borough settles it. I thank you for your recommendation (Brentwood Resident) I will try other ways to contact the borough.
I will include the only two facts relevant to my complaint of illegal parking below to reopen.
--------------------------------
Mark Nix Plumbing - Continually Blocking Sidewalk
Fact one. Parking on sidewalks is illegal at the federal, state, and local level
http://www.ada.gov/2010_regs.htm
http://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/LI/CT/HTM/75/75.HTM
http://www.ecode360.com/BR1510
http://www.brentwoodboro.com/index.php/parking-enforcement
Fact two. I have included pictures of vehicles illegally parked on a sidewalk in my posts.
I can produce more photos with time stamps at the request of the borough to
support the complaint title – “Continually Blocking Sidewalk”
If there is special zoning for this address to park on the sidewalk please include a link
or inform me of how to obtain a written copy.
Thank you.
Closed laziness over safety (Guest)
Reopened Safety over Laziness (Guest)
Closed Safety Over Laziness (Guest)
Reopened SafeJourneys (Registered User)
Closed SafeJourneys (Registered User)
Although the Borough never officially responded here; It has been over three weeks since I have seen any trucks blocking the sidewalk.
I will now take the time to close this issue and to say Thank You to Mark Nix Plumbing for obeying the law and improving public safety in the neighborhood.