Sharraxaadda
I walk my dog along this section of 37th from 192nd to 188th every day, as well as 192nd from 37th to International Blvd, and routinely see vehicles exceeding 40mph Commuters are presumably using these neighborhood streets as a traffic-light-free shortcut A few traffic humps would be an inexpensive way to greatly increase vehicle and pedestrian safety Dog-walk photo included for cuteness, but at different location
13 Faalladas
La qiray City of SeaTac (La Caddeeyey Rasmi ah)
City of SeaTac (La Caddeeyey Rasmi ah)
MTK (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
lwill (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
lwill (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
City of SeaTac (La Caddeeyey Rasmi ah)
We'll look to see what speeding data we have on these roadway segments. If we don't have any recent data, we'll setup up tube counters to better understand vehicle speeds here. It looks like we could at least add a speed limit placard for NB traffic on 37th Ave near S 192nd St. S 192nd St appears to have sufficient speed limit signage already.
In order to get speed humps installed, there's a detailed engineering process that needs to occur first. Even if traffic data supports installation of speed humps and they're feasible from an engineering standpoint, a petition is required from all residents directly impacted by these improvements requiring a 60% approval threshold.
Reality is that not everyone wants speed humps on their street for one reason or the other. For example, having a speed hump in front of your home increases vehicle noise, reduces emergency response times, and makes snow plowing difficult. This is why the petition process is necessary and installation of speed humps is not a trivial improvement.
We'll keep you posted on the data collection front and see where that takes us.
lwill (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
Thru the years they have done the tube counters. The problem has been where they were put. On 192nd it was put where people have to slow down to turn onto 37th so the speed is not accurate for what they are really doing. On 37th the counter was put too close to 192nd where they have to slow down to stop at the stop sign on 192nd. I live on 37th and A few years ago I was turning into my driveway (coming from 188th) and the person was going so fast they couldn’t stop. They tried to pass me on the left side (the direction I was turning) They hit my car went into my yard, took out the fire hydrant and my neighbors mailbox.
I would think that more than 60% of the home owners in 37th would love to have speed bumps installed.
City of SeaTac (La Caddeeyey Rasmi ah)
LindsayD (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
LindsayD (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
City of SeaTac (La Caddeeyey Rasmi ah)
The City collected traffic data using pneumatic tube counts from Tuesday, February 27th, 2024 to Monday, March 26, 2024. If you would like a copy of the data, please contact me at pkang@seatacwa.gov.
To be fair and consistent with how we approach roadways such as yours the City must rely on procedures and data to make decisions on these matters. The Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program (NTSP) is our current policy on speeding issues. Per the NTSP, traffic data must show that at least 15% of the overall traffic volume on the roadway exceeds the posted speed limit by at least 10 mph to implement traffic calming measures.
As of today, these roadways do not meet the speed criteria. Along South 192nd Street, 3.9% of vehicles exceed the speed limit by 10 mph or more. Along 37th Avenue South, 2.8% of vehicles exceed the speed limit by 10 mph or more.
Since you had originally requested speed humps, I want to briefly explain how the City makes the determination on whether Phase II traffic calming measures, such as speed humps, are appropriate for any subject roadway. If the speeding criteria referenced above had been met, the City would have first implemented less restrictive, Phase I traffic calming measures including pavement markings, flashing speed signs, and police speed traps. Once these improvements were in place, a second 7-day pneumatic tube count would have been performed to evaluate their effectiveness. If the second round of traffic data suggested that there were still speeding issues, we would have proceeded down the road of looking at Phase II traffic calming measures which involve more physically restrictive roadway improvements such as speed humps. Each of the following criteria must be met to move forward with a Phase II traffic calming study:
1. Average daily traffic (ADT) must meet or exceed 200 vehicles per day.
2. Traffic data must show that at least 15% of the overall traffic volume on the roadway exceeds the posted speed limit by 10 mph or more.
3. The subject roadway must not be classified as an ‘arterial’.
4. The existing roadway grade must not be steeper than 10%.
5. 60% of residents directly impacted by the proposed traffic calming improvements would need to approve moving forward with the proposed work.
LindsayD (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)
neighbor (Isticmaale Diiwaangashan)