Thank you for your attention to this issue. I will forward this for proper Property Maintainance enforcement.
Terry murphy

Still an issue.

I will forward to the PMO. Thanks for staying on this.
Terry Murphy

Thank you. I realize that there is a process, but that process is under 12m in time frame from the time the letter to remedy gets sent out to court process, etc. At this rate the amount of violations Mr. Rechburg should have in court he could sit there all day and not be done going through all violations. Meanwhile everyone else has to comply in a timely manner.

This property not only STILL has this wood up, but the ceiling is falling from the roof, all the way down to the first floor. This is a fire hazard next to my business. How is this allowed to be passed up, yet vacant apartments above me need to be up to code? How is one enforced and not the other? This property also doesn't keep up with snow removal. How is this ACTUALLY going to be addressed? What about this law: 1. ALL ORDERS TO REMEDY ISSUED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 12, 2015 MUST STATE THE DATE OF
THE ORDER AND MUST INCLUDE A STATEMENT SUBSTANTIALLY SIMILAR TO THE FOLLOWING:
NOTICE: Full compliance with this order to remedy is required by _____ [specify date],
which is thirty (30) days after the date of this order. If the person or entity served with
this order to remedy fails to comply in full with this order to remedy within the thirty (30)
day period, that person or entity will be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000 per
day of violation, or imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both.

Thanks for alerting me to this. I would appreciate it if you could confirm the address, then I will follow up on it.
Thanks, Terry Murphy

Its 59 S. Main St., the gps on my app gave it the address on original complaint.

Thank you.

Still an issue. Also to add on, I was told by the fire inspector that the reason why these buildings are allowed to go UNinspected is because they are vacant however this particular building is attached to a storage unit that is occupied and people are paying to use. so I would feel that an inspection would be warranted on this property as well since any other building that has PARTIAL occupancy is subject to FULL inspection. Please advise.

Still an issue.

Still here. The other side of the building is now worse, you can see ceiling caved in from top floor to bottom.

*to note this was the original complaint on this property back in 2015, for new administration

Thank you. We are working on the property issues through our Zoning and Property Maintenance Officers. We will continue to work on it.

Legal action has been approved by the Board and sent to the owner on this issue. We are hoping to have this resolved in the near future.

That’s wonderful, because right now the entire flat roof has separated from the exterior walls and is caving into the building.

This issue is currently under legal notice with anticipated actions required by August 1, 2018.

As can be seen, the issue was not resolved and now has a court action date of October 5, 2018.

At the conclusion of legal action, the village acquired four properties including this one. Two have since been sold, one is scheduled for demolition, and this one is awaiting a closing date. Conditions of sales include renovation work. It's a long road but thank you for your advocacy!

Thanks for fixing this request!

Thank you for all your hard work!