Update from the Codes Compliance Department: a case has been opened and is being investigated for this reported location. Any further updates or action will be handled by the Codes department. To track the status of this case, or to find contact information for the assigned investigator, click here:

https://actiononline.stpete.org/Click2GovCE/casesearch.html?caseYear=18&caseNumber=6363

or call 727-893-7373 and refer to the above case number.

Codes Compliance 6 hat dieses Thema J Corbett zugeordnet

This is a duplex with no drive way. Previous attempt to convert the area in reference as yard into driveway accessing from driveway. Empty lot next door over the years has been used to park in. New owner of both lot and new owner of duplex as of last year. I attempted to buy and demolish. Not a perfect situation for an income property. Over the years issue with squatter, drug dealer, domestic, wrongful eviction, and owners not reinvesting rent and taking proper care for paying tenants. I believe the new owner is not PINELLAS co.and has several similar properties. Helpful suggestion: Vacate Alley. Small parcel in middle of alley is now owned by same owner of lot next 726. He no longer requires access with alley for trailer size lot. He purchased it also just last year Mr Gowen I believe is his name. This is the first ever opportunity to vacate this unnecessary alley. The home owner behind 726 would greatly appreciate the driveway too.

Block content is fine. Sharing the history and the suggestion was only too help. No complaints. Acknowledging your having received it is enough. Thank you.

City staff does not block content, it is done by SeeClickfix's auto-filter which is outlined in the user agreement. Sometimes an innocuous combination of words will trigger the filter and it will remain blocked until a SeeClickFix staff person reviews it. Thank you for your help with this issue. Sincerely, Mayor's Action Center

The issue that you reported previously has been addressed by the City, and this open work order is now closed. Please feel free to submit future requests to us via SeeClickFix St. Pete, and thanks again!

Why close the case? Nothing has changed in almost three months so why bother to resubmit? The tenants can park on the street but refuse to. Whenever there is a car there it is in the front yard and was there Sunday, Monday and Wednesday (I don't go by every day) so do you have to catch them in the act? Would a photo do in the space provided below? Also now there is a car parked in the seldom used alley without a tag for more than a month. Which was obviously there when last inspected if there was an inspection. The other tenant occasionally parks a taxi cab there which is also probably not up to codes.

Reopen acknowledged

The issue that you reported previously has been addressed by the City, and this open work order is now closed. Please feel free to submit future requests to us via SeeClickFix St. Pete, and thanks again!

still parking in yard, old taxi in alley with no tag going on 6 months, no reason to close this case, took some pictures today

Acknowledged - forwarded to Codes

Update from Codes: the location of the car in the photo is off an alley and is not considered yard parking, therefore is not a violation. No further investigation is warranted and the codes investigation is closed to compliance.

this car is still in the alley, not even on the lot, no tag,over 6 months

This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 4004477.

Issue 4004477 has already been closed and archived.
Please follow the link to view details on the resolution
of issue 4004477.