Florida Statute 838.022.
MISUSE OF PUBLIC OFFICE by a public servant.

the Site Plan enlarged.
DUMPSTER IS TO BE STORED IN REAR STORAGE YARD.

the Site Plan also shows a required Handicap Parking Space required in the first parking spot closest to Gantt av. .
Currently there's NO dedicated Handicap Parking at this property.

It's time for County Commissioners to remove the current County Administrator.

Jonathan Lewis has been appointed the ultimate responsibility to uphold and assure that Sec. 124-7. Delegation of Authority happens.

And it's crystal clear that it's not...........

Public Service is public trust and the Gantt av residents north of Palmer blvd. have been and still are being robbed of this needed trust.

I shared this image with County in October 2019. And not a one of you current County employees would acknowledge the Development/Site required DUMPSTER'S required storage truth.

actually, any/all dumpsters do require a concrete slab 12 ft. x 12 ft. both in width & depth. Then the 8' high walls beyond the 12 x 12 slab. THAT'S THE DUMPSTER CODE'S minimum REQUIREMENTS .

These property owners need to play by the same rules as all others must...

None of this was a problem while YOU were a tenant at the property for 9+ years….

Hello to the interim Chief Building Official, Steve Bell.

This dumpster that's currently stored forward the front building line and now with a recent and completely non-compliant DUMPSTER enclosure addition.
That was added WITHOUT an approved BUILDING PERMIT issued.
This DUMPSTER and enclosure remains a reoccurring violation. Also a new code violation for construction without plans submitted and approved. When the ORDERED TO CORRECT by the Special Magistrate was not met !

Let's see if you can be the honest public servant and come see us Gantt av. home owners and provide us with p u b l i c s e r v i c e.

124-281.- current code section and the 1975 code section 5.11. .
Both deny the continuance of Casual, Temporary or Illegal use of land or structures. Or both, land and structures in combination.

here's 1975 code section 5.11.

WOW RONNIE NONE OF THIS WAS A PROBLEM WHEN YOU WERE HERE. BUT SINCE YOU GOT KICKED OUT OF THE BUILDING , NOW ITS A PROBLEM??????? NOTHING BUT RETALIATION?????? ALL WE CAN DO IS PRAY FOR YOUR EVIL HEART.

Hey Steve.
Florida BUILDING CODE VIOLATION COMPLAINTS have been made, using SEECLICKFIX SARASOTA.

A big pat on the backs to all of the SEECLICKFIX SITE employees and to the creators/owners too. You have an awesome site.
The sad truth in this case. Is the end user, Sarasota County Government has some corrupt employees abusing, ignoring and covering-up the reported evidence presented through the SEECLICKFIX site.

.

Complete disrespect, by B.W. and his boss/"currently blocked" , both are relying on the associated and corrupt County employees chronic misuse of their positions power to benefit others.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

There's two different zones abutting. And there's very specific and mandatory county codes that have been highlighted and presented in this complaint that are being violated. This complaint needs to be investigated by honest Public servants.
Steve Bell, you've been requested for onsite public service, via email and by this SEECLICKFIX site.
THERE'S DEFINITELY FLORIDA BUILDING CODES IN VIOLATION AT 757 GANTT AVENUE. THAT ARE REOCCURRING.

Allow me to remind you once again. Sarasota county code 124 - 281. Is being violated at 757 Gantt avenue.
A dumpster and a non-compliant dumpster enclosure addition are located forward the front building line at this subject property. The code 124 - 124 and also code section 124- 123, both are being violated in county employees are knowingly an intentionally ignoring these facts all in an attempt to benefit the property owners of this subject property.

Steve Bell, there's significant problems being covered up by your County associates.
Amazing, that there's 10 county employees lying to the public, covering up code violations and associated penalties and fines and waiving associated procedures for required permits and the permit fees. That are long overdue.

Steve
Also, this complaint is required to be investigated and publicly documented /recorded with photos.

Troyer, you're real good at sarcasm and your " terrible terry" pat lying.
The picture you posted. I was loading finished product to be delivered. Of which, loading and unloading is 100% allowable at any warehouse building. That's the whole concept, you do your business inside and when you're done it leaves the property.
You can keep trying to twist the facts. While the property owners, you and the other tenants continue to ignore the very mandatory County codes language that's obviously being violated by the property owners and each of you there, everyday.

As far as your theory on me being kicked out of the building. You go ahead and run with your small talk all you want,. Please, try and realize, beyond that property. Most others know the real facts and they've seen the whole truth of why the place remains a nuisance to the abutting residential properties. What's worse, is the concrete trucks illegal operations and the corrupt County employees you and the others are relying on to continue your world.

Like I've said along the way. In the few times I have responded to you. I'm using this site for what it's designed for. For communicating with Sarasota County's officials. Sadly though, they're being paid and not doing the jobs that they were hired to do, even after they've sworn to an oath as public servants.

It’s not a theory Ronnie. Ever since the building owner decided not to renew your lease, for obvious reasons, the building and everything about it became a nuisance and a violation. The dumpster was never an issue until you were no longer a tenant. Don’t twist the facts. Also, incase you weren’t aware, a buildings landscaping, setbacks, or parking lot does not require to be updated unless an alteration to the building is performed that requires a permit. According to your train of thought, your house should be updated to all of the current building codes that are in effect today just because they have changed since it was built

Wasn't aware at that point in time that the dumpster was a code violation. The reality is, it is a violation.You just won't accept the fact that county officials did issue a notice of violation for the dumpster placement & storage area and for not having the code required 12 ft by 12 ft concrete slab. Just as the code clearly reads and is required to have 8 ft high walls and Gates beyond the 12x12 minimum interior slab. And the code also requires the dumpster enclosure wall materials must match the building facade. Of which, none of the dumpster enclosure minimum requirements exist. Nor did they apply for and get approval for the non-compliant efforts they made to wrap the current dumpster location with wood fence panels. And Dan Smith, a County CE officer has lied that the dumpster codes minimum requirements have been met.
As far as the property's required continuous hedge. That does not exist. County also issued a notice of violation for failure to maintain the required continuous hedge along the entire frontage facing Gant... If you look at the original property's Site drawing. That's also submitted into public record with the notice of violations issued. That Site Plan shows the continuous hedge is required along the entire frontage facing Gantt and still does not exist. Also, I've presented numerous times, the County's definition code section 90-96.- for a hedge. That applies when Industrial property abuts Residential properties or is across the street from Residential properties...
The Hedge code requires plants planted every 36 in on center. With the exception of a 5 foot setback the driveway, on both sides.

So, You keep ignoring the obvious mandatory code language that's not being enforced, it's very apparent that you are ignoring the governing code requirements.
And the codes that I've been quoting. All were in effect/governing since 1975 , more than 10 years prior to the property being developed.
That's why if you view the original approved site plan. It shows the continuous hedge across the entire frontage of the property facing Gantt and it also shows the dumpster storage area in the rear yard with a enclosure around it.
Something new, I didn't realize until recently. The off street parking lot has a required handicap parking space required in the first parking space closest to Gantt.
Keep ignoring the obvious requirements. Just as the county officials have been...
You're following the same mode as your father, with sarcasm and lack of respect towards the abutting residential community's safety and property values.

Save your breath if you're gonna continue with sarcasm. I'm not gonna continue a conversation with somebody that's disrespectful towards the honest residents of Gantt.

I made a comment that 90-96 was regarding the continuous hedge. That's incorrect the 90-96 code is the definition for the word store or storage. Of which, was applied to the notice of violation issued for the dumpster being stored forward the front building line.

🤣🤣 The reason you didn’t realize it was a “violation” was because it was conveniently located outside of the bay you were renting. Just admit it. It wasn’t until you left that you tried to find anything and everything wrong with the property. For many years it was the greatest thing since sliced bread because you could walk across the street to work. Now that you’re no longer welcome, your trying everything in your power to condemn the property

You just don't get it.
You have no vested interest on this street. And your opinions are far from being relative to the situation.
The N.O.V's are real.
Just as your narrative/sarcasm are very real and your showing the viewers your really full of disrespect too.

I'll show you the code124-281 again. It was adopted into law for cases with circumstances such as the 757 Gantt property.
Especially, when two different zones abut one another OR are across the street from one another.
That's why the commissioners of the past have developed and adopted such codes to help maintain Harmony.

It's a shame you hoose not to comprehend the simple understandings of these codes. That have been thought of then adopted into law. Long before you were born....

Ok buddy. Whatever you say 😉

The fact of the matter is, nothing was an issue until you were no longer a tenant. That’s what it all boils down to

I see how you operate. You hold only a one-sided conversation. I suggest you get your ears cleaned out. You make absolutely no discussion about the reality of why the county issued violations you only want to try and blame a resident that's affected by y'alls willingness to degrade a residential communities property values.

I'll say it again, get your ears cleaned out.
You can keep on blurting all you sarcasm. You're entitled to an opinion. Just realize your sarcasm may wake you up in the middle of the night... if you ever develop a healthy conscience.
Over n out.

There was zero sarcasm in my last post. Speaking of one sided conversations, you seem to be doing the same thing. If you were still a tenant, none of this would be going on because you would not be reporting code violations against the same building your using

Your request was added to an existing case. If you have further questions or concerns, please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000. Thank you for reporting this issue to Sarasota County Government.

another absolute lie !

Dan Smith and you Cnty. employees touching this case.

Your involvement/ public records undeniably show your intentional efforts having been made up to know. All are to swerve the public and falsify public records in an attempt to cover-up the undeniable code violations.
Your involvement is only to benefit violators.

Sad but true
There is ZERO evidence of honest public services within Sarasota County's Administration.
Only employees playing HIDE n SEEK.

Shame on all of you, including the violators too.

also,Remind yourselves what a continuous hedge looks like.

REMEMBER: Click image(s) to ENLARGE.

Then: read AND apply
Code section 124-122.(d.)3. WHEN PLANTED AS A HEDGE.

> CLICK IMAGE/CODE 124-122.
> READ HIGHLIGHTED CODE.
>ENFORCE CODE.

Dan Smith and associated employees, stop the lying.

WANTED:
SARASOTA COUNTY EMPLOYEE WHISTLE BLOWER.

Your request was added to an existing case. If you have further questions or concerns, please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000. Thank you for reporting this issue to Sarasota County Government.

What case ?
There's not a single individual at the contact center that will answer the question:
What case has this request been added to ?

.

Simple question asked.
You refuse to answer.
Just as I've already stated, no professionalism whatsoever.
Y'all have selective hearing also. You've proven that just as well.

There's absolutely no hedge along the entire frontage of the subject property. Therefore the property's owners are failing to maintain the property's required landscape development Rights Of Way continuous hedge and also their Code violation issued with an ORDER TO CORRECT the violation.

.

The subject property fails to maintain a required compliant continuous hedge along the entire Frontage facing Gantt. So this complaint remains open.

The violation still exists. And Unethical behaviors by the County contact center refusing to acknowledge the reported facts.

Ronnie I see a code violation at your house from here. the fence or hedges in your front yard are only supposed to be 4 ft tall. I guess your going to have to cut down all your palm trees now. It impedes with the line of sight vision for automobiles Ingressing and egressing from your driveway. Therefore creating a safety hazard for the public going up and down Gantt Avenue 🤔🤔

.

I've requested to meet with a code enforcement officer on Gantt av. .
Still awaiting for a code enforcement officer to reach out and schedule a visit on Gantt with my neighbors and I.
Sarasota County Contact
The Center employees are denying my public service request by closing this SEECLICKFIX inquiry.
When: the N.O.V. issued has an ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS. That ORDER TO CORRECT cleary has not met compliance.
There's absolutely no continuous hedge on either section of the property frontage facing Gantt av.

Undeniably, S.C.C.C. employees are misusing the Sarasota County's Contact Center's services. By closing/concealing this citizen's reported evidence.
County employees, your participating in maintaining this code violation.

.

Truly, there's not public service or any professionalism at all levels from Sarasota County government employees.
This seeclickfix site is being abused by the S.C.C.C. staff.

.

,,,

This code enforcement complaint h a s n o t received the County's required code enforcement investigation procedures. Nor has this reoccurring violation complaint been publicly recorded as required.
The evidence photos within this seeclickfix complaint. Clearly, show all three violations that were originally issued in the notice of violations to this property. Still remain as violations.
The dumpster is stored where: code section 124-124. prohibits any storage forward the front building line.

There is no continuous hedges along the entire frontage facing Gantt av. .

And, there's 08 of the 20 parking spaces car stops still missing.

All three of these code violations listed have not met code compliance.
The photos don't lie...

.

Explain why you closed this request.
The violation still exists...

.

This complaint remains open til N.O.V. is issued.
Sadly, whoever you are operating the Sarasota County Contact Center. Your denying public serbices. An unethical behavior by a County employee.

.

contact center and at least (11) county employees are crooked & corrupt.

remember others are watching your ways

Your request was added to an existing case. If you have further questions or concerns, please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000. Thank you for reporting this issue to Sarasota County Government.

Sarasota County contact center employees, your unethical Behavior / actions towards the Gant Avenue reoccurring code violations that have been reported to your desk. Of which, you've wllfully and intentionally participated in allowing these violations to continue.
Shame on you.
Good luck with keeping your job.

Your request was added to an existing case. If you have further questions or concerns, please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000. Thank you for reporting this issue to Sarasota County Government.

Reporting to Sarasota County Contact Center is like talking to a wall.
The REOCCURRING violations are part of you now. Your choices are _________.
A) not good.
B) unethical/ cause for dismissal from employment.
C) dishonesty w/ intent.
D) all the above.

E) THEY ARE TIRED OF YOUR RETALIATION EFFORTS RONNIE!!!!!!!!

T.t.
It's called push back not retaliation. When we, your included, have corrupt County employee public records evidence and the reoccurring code violations still exist.
The reported code violations have been mishandled and are being criminally maintained...
You keep looking the other way. While crooked County Employees are still misusing their positions power.

Tt, show the people that you're not one-sided with your views.

Explain how requesting enforcement of the codes 124-123. & 124-124. is retaliation. When, both codes clearly read there shall be no storage forward the front building line when the subject property (757 Gantt av.) abuts residential properties or is across the street from residential properties.
Additionally, you and many others have now seen the 757 Gantt av. property's original SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. It shows the dumpster is to be stored in the rear storage yard.

Sarasota County's zoning ordinance language above does apply to all of us.

Sadly, all of your previous SEECLICKFIX remarks positively do prove you choose to disregard the applicable and mandatory enforcement code language.

Your request was added to an existing case. If you have further questions or concerns, please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000. Thank you for reporting this issue to Sarasota County Government.

Contact Center employees, your denying citizens County's Standard Operating Procedures.
The violations exist.

Reoccurring violations still exist and so does dishonest Code Enforcement employees, Dan Smith and his associates....

Your request was added to an existing case. If you have further questions or concerns, please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000. Thank you for reporting this issue to Sarasota County Government.

The violations reported, do still exist. There's NEVER been any permits applued for.... So, volunteer compliance has not occurred. There's only been County employee corruption and favoritism for this subject property allowing them to maintain reoccurring violations to continue.

Contact center, you're lying through your teeth and you're falsify public records with false info as the truth.

Continue to benefit others, it'll cost you your job.

Your request has been received and forwarded to our Code Enforcement department. Provided tracking number in an email. Please call the Contact Center at (941) 861-5000 for more information.

This complaint/code violation still exists. Any and all dumpster enclosure / storage areas are required to be in a side or rear yard when the subject property abuts residential properties... The subject property's original site plan shows a dedicated /allowable storage location for a dumpster pad, in the rear storage yard. Yet we have code enforcement guy named Dan Smith that has lied to the public and just the same, Michele Norton has also lied to the public. By stating that a dumpster is not considered storage.
Code section 124-123 & 124-124. - both of these codes govern the subject property. And prohibit any refuse or dumpster storage areas forward the front building line/ in the street yard.

Obviously the County planning and development services and Associated divisions continue to refuse public service by denying required standard operating procedures for code enforcement complaints, at the subject property.
The violations still exist and the list of County employees that have been previously mentioned and this complaint are still covering up the obvious

Sarasota County employees that are involved in this corruption and favoritism have yet to make a single effort to respond to this complaining they keep abusing their positions power and closing out any public record complaint made/reported.

thank goodness

07-01-2022, Friday.

Thank goodness for cameras and mandatory codes. Now, we just need honest public servants and some respectful tenants, that are willing to follow the County's Land Use Regulations that exist to protect the abutting residential neighbors interests.

Unfortunately, we have 11 Sarasota County employees who are definitely abusing their positions power, to benefit the 757 Gantt av. owners and their tenants.

Banana

So what’s your complaint? Government employees not doing their job and/or lying? So you think the best option is to submit multiple annoying, repetitive claims on a third party app?

Good luck with that

Also your visuals look like a dumpster fire

Ever since you killed your ex wife and took her home, you've really lost it..