Description
I know this has been posted before, but I think PA Now needs to better censor the comments posted on the website. I agree everyone should be entitled to free-speech, but when given anonymity the comments get rude and racist. Obviously if email addresses are posted with comments, people will start receiving hate-mail, but something needs to be done to prevent the vile comments some people leave.
Would having to submit comments for review before being posted on the website help? What are your thoughts and suggestions?
62 Comments
Erin (Guest)
tell (Guest)
Mr Hermiteowitch (Guest)
Shelley (Guest)
cmd (Guest)
I don't see the point, other than people to say hateful things....without identifying themselves. I will no longer be using this site and highly recommend others stop also.
Peg (Guest)
If email addresses were posted with the names, then those posting, all of them, would be subject to the whims and whimsies of spambots and spiders, as well as being available for people to take some arguments off the boards.
What I would like to see is a 'dislike' button, or some sort of rating system that would be automated. So many low/dislike ratings, the post is automatically removed.
Shelley (Guest)
Andy (Guest)
Vicki (Guest)
GloriousPA (Guest)
Pam (Guest)
Agnostic333 (Registered User)
Pam (Guest)
PA'snextmayor (Guest)
Peg (Guest)
Another option might be that you have to be a member of the site before you can post anything. In theory, if they use an email confirmation programme, they'll have the email address of those who don't post in an adult manner and they can either be reprimanded or banned from posting.
It's just a thought.
We're moving into the digital age, and 'instant communications' is becoming the norm. PA either has to get with the programme, or stay locked in the previous century.
Janine (Guest)
paNOW (Guest)
I can assure our paNOW readers that we have a person moderating the comment sections around the clock. All comments that violate are policy are removed in a timely fashion and those who can't follow the rules are dealt with. People should appreciate that some of the comments are border line and are a judgement call. You the reader though have the opportunity to challenge the moderator's decision by "flagging" a comment innapropriate. This temporarly removes the comment from the section and alerts us to have another look at it. So essentially, the reader can have a role in policing the site.
Thanks for the input folks.
- paNOW
Vlasic (Registered User)
Pam (Guest)
Vlasic (Registered User)
Pam (Guest)
the truth (Guest)
Yasmin (Guest)
@PA Now - Yes, comments are taken down if they're inappropriate, but as you can see from the posts to this issue, that's not enough. The rude and racist comments are still seen by hundreds of people before they are taken down. There needs to be a way to keep these comments from being seen. Adults are not the only people that can access this website.
I completely agree with Pam. Becoming a member in order to post comments is a great idea. That's how other public forums run and it would be easier to deal with those abusing the site or just being rude because they can. Email addresses would not be posted, but members could be banned more easily for inappropriate comments.
This would be a simple way to solve the problem. What do you think, PA Now?
the truth (Guest)
Pam (Guest)
the truth (Guest)
disgusted (Guest)
Janine (Guest)
Pam (Guest)
And you said if it's not too offensive... What would be too offensive in your opinion if saying your mother deserved to die isn't????
Erin (Guest)
the truth (Guest)
Closed Mr Hermiteowitch (Registered User)
yomomma (Guest)
itsnotfair (Guest)
Reopened Yasmin (Guest)
Peg (Registered User)
yomamma, racism is rampant and works both ways. There are people who don't check to see if a native was involved at all. They automatically assume that was the case and start their diatribe. It's just like all hit and runs are by drunk drivers, every cyclist probably deserved to be hit because they were doing something "stupid" and every attack in the city involves drugs and/or gangs in some way. Oh, and if it's not City Hall's fault, it's the fault of the federal or provincial government.
Both sides of this argument are going to have to learn new tactics and some diplomacy if they want their side of the story to be heard and not just repeated as gossip.
Emma (Registered User)
Hi all,
It's great to see SeeClickFix being used to voice your concerns about this issue. We think constructive conversation is good, especially when it's directed towards the identification and ultimate resolution of reported issues such as this one. That's why it's important to move the conversation forward as opposed to backwards. As a website designed to publicly address community issues, SeeClickFix would also like to emphasize the importance of respect on this forum. Comments that are attacking other users, contain harsh language, etc, are subject for removal.
As you continue your discussion, please let us know if there are any questions or concerns we can address for you. Our email is contact@seeclickfix.com
Keep SeeClickFixin'!
Emma
Julie (Guest)
Wow! I think this issue has gotten a little out of hand. Those of you that are advocating for the comment section to be removed due to rude comments are literally attacking those who are defening the comment section...my observation from the way the posts are worded...Things can easily be taken out of context in text/written word and I realize this, the question is, do you?
Personally, I could really care less if there is a comment section or not. I see both sides of the story. I can see that people want the comments removed due to hurtful posts, I totally get it. At the same time, I can also see the reasons why people want the comment section open. People like to feel that their opinion is being heard.
As for the newspapers not having a comment section...what do you think coffee shops are for? There are always comments on every news story that is told whether it's on a public forum on the internet like this, or morning coffee time at the Co-op for example. There have always been ways to voice opinions about the news.
I think a solution could be to limit which stories can be commented on. For example, a car accident happens resulting in the loss of a life, I don't feel it necessary for people to comment on something like that. Stories like floods in the province, or the federal elections, why not leave those open for comments. Afterall, EVERYONE has an opinion about politics and that seems to be acceptable.
I just want to share some of my observations...
Last week when that young girl passed away, 99% of the comments on the story were well wishes and sympathy posts for the family. Very few comments were negative...although, unfortunately there were some negative comments. That is extremely unfortunate and I agree that yes, those comments should be removed as soon as they are posted, or not allowed up at all because there will always be those that will comment back about said person being rude and hurtful and the fight is on.
We cannot force people to change their ways/views/opinions what we can do is choose to not respond to negative comments, and flag them as inappropriate so they will be removed.
Please also note that I am not trying to attack anyone with this post, I am merely trying to find a common ground that we can all be happy with. What are your opinions on the suggestion to allow comments on some stories but not others?
2cents (Guest)
I think that PAnow is doing a great job of moderating. It's probably not an easy task for them to be supervising a site 24/7 to make sure idiots don't post something inappropriate. And for everyone to say they aren't doing anything, I don't know and I'm sure you don't know either, how many comments have been deleted or changed or how many people have been blocked.
And instead of blaming this site for the racism and crap going on in this city, blame the community members!!! They're the ones at fault! Better yet, do something to try to change it!
Perhaps one of the good people on here who aren't racist and don't like what is going on in PA should try to do something good for the community. Volunteer. Start an anti-racism campaign. Do something other than complain on here!
Pam (Guest)
Julie (Guest)
thetruth (Registered User)
Pam (Guest)
Yasmin (Guest)
Peg (Registered User)
Personal attacks. That can be a slippery slope, too. Some people take everything said as a personal attack if it doesn't agree with the way they think. Then you have people who come completely unglued when someone suggests that the first person needs to look into the story/subject more. In 15 years of moderating forums, I find that these people are usually the ones who are treating "common knowledge" as fact or they can't be arsed to go looking for more information.
I think membership to be allowed to post is necessary. You may not get the 'real name' of a person, but you'll have some sort of consistency in who posts what. The drawback to this is that "volunteer moderators" may not be an option. PANow would have to hire more mods to help keep track of the members and what they post. PANow is a relatively new idea in PA. Is there enough money available to be able to hire the needed mods? Is there enough return for value in it?
Brown bread (Guest)
Julie (Guest)
@ Peg...probably one of the most intellegent posts I have seen on this topic. I agree with you. I am a firm believer that in order to comment on something, you should do your homework and know what you are talking about. In cases like that, a healthy and respectful debate can be established.
@ Brown Bread...I also agree with your post. There are always people that are going to sling mud. These are the people we need to try to ignore and flag.
Maybe having to register would be a solution. That way people might think twice about what they are posting, however, like Peg mentioned, people still won't necessarily use their real name, and its not terribly cost effective for PAnow to hire more moderators for the purpose of policing forums. The economical thing to do would be to remove the comment section entirely and quite honestly, I personally don't feel that extreme action like that needs to be taken. Like I mentioned before, maybe limiting which stories comments are allowed on would also be an option.
Peg (Registered User)
Read the rules (Guest)
Brown bread (Guest)
RyanR (Guest)
It would be nice if they changed the commenting section so there was some degree of self moderation. Similiar to the comments @ tomshardware.com
Comments can be thumbed up OR down. If a comment has a rating of less than a number defined by the site... lets say... -5. The comment gets hidden.
John Fryters (Guest)
To paNOW moderators. Why give anonymity ? You will never have a decent debate if people can hide behind pseudonyms. If people can not give their real name and have to hide, their comments can not be counted in the category of "free speech".
John Fryters
Peg (Registered User)
Dan (Guest)
guest (Guest)
Thedude (Guest)
crispb (Guest)
news talk 980/650 websites used to have comments... it lasted a few months. Now I think comments are only enabled on blog postings... no more on news articles.
leaderpost website in regina... comments are only enabled on certain stories. Generally stories involving crimes had comments disabled.
Vlasic (Registered User)
Closed Nicholle (Guest)
Nicholle (Guest)
theThinker (Registered User)
remember the old adage about the Light shining on the truth, or something like that
there is NO BETTER way to deal with racist, or hateful comments than putting them out there for all to see, and for everyone to take the time to reply, respectfully or not, to let the Hater know we know they are out there
we should not let the haters hide in the shadows. We should shine the light on them brightly
ifawoigwi (Guest)