Mô tả
Since the opening of the Mountain View Corridor, the traffic on 90th South West of 4000 has increased dramatically. This is concerning for many reasons; there have been multiple accidents, some at extremely high speeds and causing property damage and physical injury; there are elementary school children who walk to and from school along 90th, to multiple schools, one of which is just North of 90th on 4800 West. The high speed of the large trucks/diesels traveling this stretch is scary, given statistics on the time it takes such a vehicle to come to a complete stop. The amount of people who speed in either direction in this area is high. Also, for the home owners who back 90th South, the noise has increased significantly. Several years ago, truck traffic was diverted from 90th South to Old Bingham Highway; I am not sure why that diversion was lifted. Old Bingham Highway, between 4800 West and Mountain View, has much less traffic and residential area compared to 90th South. I would like to ask that some attention and consideration be given to those two concerns: rerouting trucks and providing a sound wall to the residents backing 90th. Thank you.
7 Bình luậns
Angi Fankhauser (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Thank you
Angi Fankhauser
Được thừa nhận UDOT Region 2 (Chính thức đã xác nhận)
Alicia - UDOT Region 2 Traffic Operations (Chính thức đã xác nhận)
Thank you for taking time to contact UDOT with your concern about the vehicle noise and heavy truck traffic on 9000 South in between Mountain View Corridor and 4800 South. The heavy truck traffic diversion down to Old Bingham Highway that you saw a few years back was more than likely due to interchange construction at the 9000 South/ Mountain View Corridor intersection which would temporarily block truck access to Mountain View Corridor. Now that the access to Mountain View Corridor has been reestablished via 9000 South it makes sense that trucks have started to utilize this route again. Aside from extremely heavy loads, wide loads, and construction diversions, UDOT isn't able to dictate where commercial vehicles are allowed to drive on highways that we own. We try to assess and route these large trucks at our Ports of Entry when they enter the State of Utah, but once they are within our borders it becomes logistically difficult to keep tabs on them and where they choose to drive. Our roadways are designed for what is called a WB-67 vehicle which is a semi-truck with a trailer. We design the roadways geometrically and also structurally for this kind of vehicle so that the roadway can stand up to the load that it creates when it is driving on it. UDOT's SR-209 (aka 9000 South) is one of our roads that we designed so that large trucks can utilize it for commerce.
Regarding the request for noise walls please see the attached letter from our Environmental Division here at UDOT. I have been in contact with them and they deal with noise wall studies and installations.
Thank you again for contacting UDOT with your suggestions and concerns. Please reach out to us again if you have any other ideas or comments about the roadways that we all share.
Đã đóng Ryan - UDOT Region 2 Assistant Traffic Engineer (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Angi Fankhauser (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Angi Fankhauser (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
Ryan - UDOT Region 2 Assistant Traffic Engineer (Người dùng đã đăng ký)
The letter is attached to the response given on 08/17/2017. Here is the text of the letter in case you are unable to locate or open it:
*** Dear Ms. Fankhauser-
UDOT’s current Noise Abatement Policy 08A2-01 has been developed in accordance with federal regulation 23 CFR 772 - Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise and Utah Administrative Code R930-3 – Highway Noise Abatement. Specifically within the UDOT Noise Abatement Policy there are three types of projects: Type I, Type II, and Type III. Of these project types, noise abatement (i.e. noise wall) is only considered for Type I Projects where noise impacts are identified.
Type I projects include:
a. The construction of a highway on new location; or a substantial horizontal alteration or substantial vertical alteration of an existing highway; or,
b. The addition of a through traffic lane, the addition of a through traffic lane that functions as a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane, High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lane, bus lane or climbing lane; or,
c. The addition of an auxiliary lane, except for when the auxiliary lane is a turn lane; or,
d. The addition or relocation of interchange lanes or ramps added to a quadrant to complete a partial interchange; or,
e. Restriping existing pavement for the purpose of adding a through traffic lane or an auxiliary lane; or,
f. The addition of a new or substantial alteration of a weigh station, rest stop, ride share lot or toll plaza.
g. If a project is determined to be a Type I Project under this definition, then the entire project area as defined in the environmental document is a Type 1 Project.
The current request to install noise walls in this area is considered a Type II project, defined by the policy as a “retrofit” of noise abatement along an existing highway. Currently, UDOT does not provide a Type II program.
At UDOT we recognizes we have a responsibility to minimize noise impacts that may adversely impact residents located in the vicinity of heavily traveled roads. However, implementation of the above mentioned policies and procedures results in the determination that UDOT is not able to provide installation of noise wall along the Right-of-Way near your residence at this time.
For further information regarding the UDOT Noise Abatement Policy 08A2-01 and Utah Administrative Code R930-3, please see the following links:
https://www.udot.utah.gov/main/uconowner.gf?n=10496602977480171
https://rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r930/r930-003.htm ***